2021
ESG Report

GRI
  • 103-1
  • 103-2
  • 103-3
  • 103-1
  • 103-2
  • 103-3

Three scopes of carbon footprint

The Allegro Group measures and discloses data on carbon footprint in three scopes (1, 2, and 3), which reflect the scale of our environmental impact. Carbon footprint is a measure of the impact company operations have on the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) produced through the burning of fossil fuels and is expressed as a weight of CO2 emissions produced in tonnes. Allegro’s GHG emissions include:

Scope 1:

all direct emissions released from operations. For the Allegro.eu Group, this includes natural gas, fuel consumption for vehicles and refrigerant leakages.

Scope 2:

Indirect GHG emissions from consumption of purchased electricity and heat.

Scope 3:

Indirect GHG emissions not covered in Scope 1 & 2 that occur throughout the value chain. This includes purchased goods and services (water supply, sewage, paper, packages and also marketing, IT services and consultancy), capital goods, energy and WTT fuel-related emission, waste, business travel, employee commuting, distribution (parcel transportation) from Allegro's warehouse, Allegro fulfillment and Allegro intermediary services, use of sold products downstream leased assets.

Compared to 2020, Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions per GMV (mPLN) increased by 4% (market-based method) and 8% (location-based method) in 2021.

GRI
  • 305-4
TCFD/SFDR
  • Indicator
ESG
  • E-P1
KPI
  • 8

GHG Emissions

GHG emission in relation to GMV (kt CO2e/m PLN) 

2021

2020*

YoY 

Scope 1 & 2 emissions (market-based) (kt CO2e) in relation to GMV (m PLN) 

 0.27

0.26

4%

Scope 1 & 2 emissions (location-based) (kt CO2e) in relation to GMV (m PLN) 

0.28

0.26

8%

Total (Scope 1 & 2 & 3) emissions (market-based) (kt CO2e) in relation to GMV (m PLN) 

5.11

3.9

31%

Total (Scope 1 & 2 & 3) emissions (location-based) (kt CO2e) in relation to GMV (m PLN)

5.12

3.9

31%

 

Data for 2020 and 2019 are not comparable due to the methodology adjustment.

GRI
  • 305-1
  • 305-2
  • 305-3
  • 305-5
TCFD/SFDR
  • Indicator
  • Indicator
  • Metrics and targets B

Compared to 2020, GHG Scope 1 & 2 emissions increased by 27.3% (market-based method) and 32.7% (location-based method) in 2021. This increase resulted primarily from strong operation growth and increased electricity consumption at the data centres. In order to reduce its GHG emission impact, in 2021 Allegro.eu decided to join the Science-Based Target Initiative and develop a decarbonization strategy in line with the Paris Agreement within two years.

Scope 1 direct emissions increased by 131% YoY. This increase results from natural gas uses in Adamów fulfillment centre.

Scope 2 emissions increased by 29.9% YoY (market-based) and 24.4% YoY (location-based) due to higher consumption of purchased electricity as the new logistic services was introduced in Adamów fulfillment centre. In 2021, over 15% of electricity consumed by Allegro.eu Group was generated from RES. In 2020, the company did not have any RES within its electricity purchase mix.

Scope 3 GHG emission increased 63.3% YoY, mainly driven by Allegro.eu Group business development (more shipments and more packaging being consumed in this period), as well as investments in the roll-out of a proprietary APM network.  

Source of GHG emissions [t CO2e]

GHG emission [t CO2e] 23

2021

2020
adjusted methodology*

YoY

2020

2019 

Scope 1 

579.89

250.58

131.4%

226.10

320.75

Scope 2 (location-based) 

11,382.50

8,763.48

29.9%

8,286.30

7,509.56

Scope 2 (market-based) 

11,122.08

8,941.53

24.4%

8,464.35

7,452.01

Scope 3 

206,039.04

126,201.76

63.3%

3,046.33

2,809.84

Scope 1+2+3 (location-based) 

218,001.44

135,215.82

61.2%

11,063.18

10,640.15

Scope 1+2+3 (market-based) 

217,741.02

135,393.87

60.8%

11,733.01

10,582.60

23 The greenhouse gases identified and included in the calculation are CO2, CH4 and N2O, which have been expressed as CO2 equivalent. No biogenic CO2 emissions have been identified. The emissions in 2020 were selected as the base year. The sources of emission factors were 2021 KOBIZE publications (The National Centre for Emissions Management) for gasoline, diesel oil, natural gas, electricity and heat. For other emission the main source was the 2021 DEFRA database (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in the British Government). GWP factors were adopted based on the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). Calculations were made for each subsidiary and the results were consolidated according to operational control. 100% of emissions from individual locations of the Allegro Group were taken into account. The amount of emissions from the production of consumed electricity was calculated according to two methods: location-based (electricity-related emissions calculated using country average emission factor) and market-based (electricity-related emissions calculated using the energy seller specific emission factor). In the case of the location-based method, the average emission factor for Poland was used. In the market-based method, indicators for energy suppliers were used.

 

Source of GHG emissions [t CO2e]

Scope 1 [t CO2e]

2021

2020
adjusted methodology*

YoY 

2020

2019 

Natural gas 

437.46

190.92

129.1%

190.92

226.84

Diesel 

27.73

20.35

36.3%

14.18

4.20

Petrol  

51.73

37.61

37.5%

21.00

48.71

Hybrid cars 

51.96

1.69

29.75%

   

LPG 

11.01

Scope 224[t CO2e]

2021

2020
adjusted methodology*

YoY 

2020

2019 

Electricity consumption (market-based method) 

10,575.74

8,359.38

26.5%

7,882.21

7,042.43

Electricity consumption(location-based method) 

10,836.16

8,181.33

32.4%

7,212.37

7,099.98

Heat consumption 

546.35

582.15

-6.1%

582.15

409.58

24 Please note that emission from electricity includes also emission generated by Allegro employees while working from home

Scope 3 [t CO2e]

2021

2020
adjusted methodology*

YoY 

2020

2019 

Cat. 1 – Purchased Goods and Services 

97,803.21

75,030.71

30.4%

340.99

188.20

Cat. 2 – Capital goods 

47,582.00

14,642.84

225.0%

 

Cat. 3 – Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 

2,962.07

1,254.50

136.1%

1,248.02

1,249.88

Cat. 5 – Waste Generated in Operations 

13.90

4.93

181.9%

4.93

0.23

Cat. 6 – Business Travel 

133.88

73.55

82.0%

73.55

649.21

Cat. 7 – Employee Commuting 

3,060.00

3,060.00

0.0%

Cat. 9 – Downstream Transportation and Distribution 

54,455.03

32,041.77

70.0%

1,285.38

639.70

Cat. 12 – End-of-Life Treatment of Sold Products 

14.96

6.41

133.4%

6.41

3.29

Cat. 13 – Downstream Leased Assets 

14.00

87.04

-83.9%

87.04

79.32

The GHG emissions were calculated in accordance with the following standards: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard Revised Edition, GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance, and Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard using Inventory and Screening approach – in case the first option could not be used (Screening approach was implemented using tools recommended by GHG Protocol and Science Based Targets Initiatives).

  • Cat. 1 Purchased Goods and Services: calculations involved DEFRA 2021 factors and an emissions expenditure estimation tool (Quantis). This category does not include products purchased as part of 1P retail operations due to lack of information available on emissions from products and goods. The value could be significant for the Scope 3 carbon footprint, although the 1P retail revenue accounted for 0.9% of Allegro.eu’s total GMV in FY 2021 and 0.7% of the total GMV in FY 2020.
  • Cat. 2. Capital Goods – emissions estimated using Quantis based on capital expenditure.
  • Cat. 3. Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 – emissions from the production and distribution of electricity and transport fuel – based on real Scope 1 and 2 consumption data and DEFRA 2021 emission factors.
  • Cat. 4. Upstream Transportation and Distribution – emissions were excluded from calculation.
  • Cat. 5. Waste Generated in Operations – emissions from waste generated in office buildings and warehouses – based on real data on waste generated and DEFRA emission factors.
  • Cat. 6. Business Travel – air and train travel emissions – based on real information on travel and DEFRA emission factors. 26
  • Cat. 7. Employee Commuting – emissions from employee commuting were estimated using Quantis and based on information on average employment in Group companies, including assumptions about remote work 27
  • Cat. 8. Upstream Leased Assets – emissions not applicable to the Allegro Group.
  • Cat 9. Downstream Transportation and Distribution – transport emissions from shipments from the 1P warehouse and fulfillment and shipments under Allegro Standard – based on real information about the number of parcels shipped in 2021 and the average emissions per shipment and the average emissivity of one shipment according to DPD data.
  • Cat. 10. Processing of Sold Products – emissions not applicable to the Allegro Group.
  • Cat. 11. Use of Sold Products – emissions not applicable to the Allegro Group.
  • Cat. 12. End-of-Life Treatment of Sold Products – emissions from used packaging waste (cardboard boxes, stretch film, filler, wood) – based on real data on materials purchased and DEFRA 2021 emission factors. This category does not include products purchased as part of 1P retail operations due to lack of information available on emissions from products and goods. The value could be significant for the Scope 3 carbon footprint, although the 1P retail revenue accounted for 0.9% of Allegro.eu’s total GMV in FY 2021 and 0.7% of the total GMV in FY 2020.
  • Cat. 13. Downstream Leased Assets – emissions related to offices subleased to third-party companies at locations where the Allegro Group has offices.
  • Cat. 14. Franchises – emissions not applicable to the Allegro Group.
  • Cat. 15. Investments – emissions not applicable to the Allegro Group.

26 Emissions from employees’ hotel stays on business trips were excluded.

27 It was assumed that an average of 2,384 people worked remotely at Allegro, Allegro Pay and Allegro Finance in 2021; 70% of employees at eBilet, 100% at CENEO and 0% at Xpress Couriers.

GRI
  • 302-1
  • 303-3
  • 301-1
  • 306-2
ESG
  • E-P2
  • E-S6
TCFD/SFDR
  • Indicator
  • Indicator

Environmental indicators

The table below presents our consumption indicators of energy, materials, water, waste and travel which were used to calculate the GHG emissions.

Energy [GJ]27

2021

2020
adjusted methodology* 

2020

2019

Electricity [GJ]

59,828.79

40,935.77

38,301.20

35,297.50

Heating [GJ]

5,661.64

6,032.60

6,032.60

4,244.37

Natural gas [GJ] (retail distribution and fulfillment centres) 

7,893.50

3,445.61

3,445.61

4,092.44

Petrol [GJ] 

1,483.50

543.24

303.24

703.42

Diesel [GJ] 

372.85

274.20

191.34

609.99

LPG [GJ] 

167.27

0

0

0

Total [GJ] 

75,407.54

51,231.42

48,273.99

44,947.72

27 Indicators used to convert energy to GJ are based on KOBIZE, calorific values (CV) and carbon emission factors (EF) in 2018 for reporting under the 2021 Emission Trading System and the Ministry of the Environment Regulation of 13 December 2018 on inventories containing information and data on the use of the environment and charges due.

Utilities consumption 

2021

2020
adjusted methodology* 

2020

2019

Electricity consumption [MWh] 

16,619.11

11,371.05

10,639.22

9,763.99

Heating [GJ] 

5.661,64

6,032.60

6,032.60

4,244.37

Natural gas [m3] – (retail distribution and fulfillment centres) 

216,023.40

94,296.82

94,296.82

111,754.36

Petrol [l] 

44,354.38

16,241.94

9,066.31

21,031.32

Diesel [l] 

10,342.06

7,591.40

5,297.29

16,887.84

LPG [l] 

7,072.92

Energy consumption

2021

2020
adjusted methodology* 

2020

2019

Electricity consumption (in MWh) 

16,619.11

11,371.05

10,639.22

9,763.99

Electricity usage from renewable sources (RES)28 

2,570.712

% Electricity usage from renewable sources (RES)29

15.47%

Energy intensity30(GWh/million PLN

0.003913

0.00356 

0.00482 

Revenue (million PLN) 

5,352.9

3,997.8  

2,592.3 

28 Renewable energy: Energy taken from sources that are inexhaustible, e.g. wind, water, solar, geothermal energy, and biofuels.
29Renewable Energy: Energy taken from sources that are inexhaustible, such as wind, water, solar, geothermal and biofuels.
30Total energy consumption (in GWh) (transport fuels, natural gas, electricity) relative to Allegro's revenue (in PLN m).

Water consumption 

2021

2020
adjusted methodology* 

2020

2019

Water consumption [m3] 

5,656.66

4,627.03

4,627.03

9,771.57

Water and effluent emissions [t CO2e] 

2.44

5.07

5.07

10.70

Water reclaimed (recycled/reused) [m3]  

0

0

0

0

Untreated wastewater discharged [m3] 

5,656.66

  4,627.03

  4,627.03

9,771.57

Water withdrawal is only used for offices and employees’ needs, not for production purposes.

Materials purchased in the offices 

2021

2020
adjusted methodology*

2020

2019

Paper [reams]

1,698

2,438

2,438

3,080

Envelopes [pcs] 

40,000

70,000

70,000

190,000

Ticket paper [kg] 

1,671.90

1,671.90

2,531.20

Packaging used in a warehouse [t] 

2021

2020
adjusted methodology* 

2020

2019

Cardboard packaging – 100% of recycled paper 

555.19

234.85

234.85

117.05

Original stretch film – unrecycled

54.17

48.80

48.80

22.40

Half-pallet wood 

91.54

9.97

9.97

10.98

100% recycled foil fillers, HDPE foil 

0

7.30

7.30

3.50

Waste management in all company offices and warehouses is based on recycling, in compliance with applicable Polish laws. The company monitors and reports on waste management for packaging waste placed on the market and waste generated from operations. Measures are taken to limit waste and reuse electrical equipment.

Waste 

2021

2020
adjusted methodology* 

2020

2019

Total waste [t]

340.62

185.00

183.76

10.59

Recycled waste [t] 

297.86

179.60

179.60

Non-recycled waste [t] 

42.76

6.58

6.58

Data from 2019 does not include warehouse waste.

Business travel 

2021

2020
adjusted methodology* 

2020

2019

Air travel [km] 

587,903.92

292,295.00

292,295.00

3,047,158.00

Train [km] 

730,680.00

552,543.00

552,543.00

2,389,917.00

Cars [km] 

232,895.44

146,620.93

146,620.93

* Please note that in order to be fully compliant with SBTi requirements (Allegro joined the organization in 2021), Allegro supplemented its GHG calculation by the following categories of Scope 3: Purchased Goods and Services (cat. 1), Capital Goods (cat. 2), Downstream Transportation and Distribution (cat. 9) and Employee Commuting (cat. 7) using Screening approach – the methodology adjustment for 2020 was also implemented.

No refrigerants were released in 2019, 2020 and 2021.

Green offices

Our office building in Warsaw, Poznań and Kraków obtained a BREEAM certificate with very high results in its category in Poland. Our data centre is implementing a project to improve energy efficiency, build a photovoltaic system and use off-heat at the data processing centre. The purpose of all of these initiatives is to save more electrical energy and reduce air pollution caused by emissions. An intelligent energy management system was introduced that helps reduce CO2 emissions.

ESG
  • E-P3
TCFD/SFDR
  • Strategy
TCFD/SFDR
  • Risk A
TCFD/SFDR
  • Strategy A
  • Strategy B
  • Governance A
  • Governance B
  • Risk B

As recommended by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), climate-related opportunities and risks are identified, assessed and managed at Allegro. The Company has mapped climate risks and opportunities for two climate scenarios and three time horizons.

TCFD Recommendations

Implementation method: 

Defining the short, medium and long term

  • short term period – 2022 to 2025 (current performance forecast period) 
  • medium term – 2025 to 2030 (based on EU mid-term climate goals) 
  • long term – 2030 to 2050 (based on the EU long-term climate goals) 

Analysing two different scenarios, including one assuming a temperature increase of 2°C or less

Risks were analysed in the context of two climate scenarios: 1.5-<2°C and 4°C 

Assessing the resilience of strategic plans 

Risks are assessed on a residual basis, i.e. taking into account Allegro’s existing risk management mechanisms, adopted strategy and set goals. 

In preparing climate scenarios and assessing risks, Allegro.eu used data from the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Two RCP emission pathways were identified:

  • RCP 2.6 – an emissions pathway that assumes a temperature rise of approx. 1.5°C by the end of the century:
  • RCP 8.5 – an emissions pathway that assumes a temperature rise of approx. 4°C by the end of the century

The selected climate scenarios were calibrated for local conditions and potential impacts on the sector.

Base scenario 

Alternative scenario 

1.5–2°C scenario (consistent with the Paris Agreement) 

4°C scenario 

Higher probability and scale of transformational risks (in the medium and long term): 

  • Meeting EU emission reduction targets for 2030 and 2050 
  • Poland accepts and achieves the goal of climate neutrality or reaches it with a slight delay 
  • Entry into force of all regulations promulgated by the EU and implementation of subsequent ones (e.g. expansion of the EU ETS) 
  • Significant increase in emissions costs 
  • Significant increase in consumer environmental awareness, greater demand for low-carbon products 
  • Significant increase in energy prices 
  • No negative impact on Poland’s economic growth 
  • Faster-than-ever increase in efficiency of RES technologies 

Lower probability and magnitude of transformational risks (in the medium and long term): 

  • Failure to meet EU emissions reduction targets for 2030, 2050 
  • Poland does not meet the climate neutrality target, it deviates significantly from it 
  • Entry into force of all regulations announced by the EU, but derogations are possible regarding the deadlines for achieving particular decarbonization targets for the economy and particular industries 
  • Moderate increase in emission costs 
  • Significant increase in consumer environmental awareness, greater demand for low-carbon products 
  • Gradual and moderate increase in energy prices 
  • Slower-than-expected efficiency gains in RES technologies
  • According to the IPCC’s findings on the impacts of climate change in the short term, the differences in temperature increases through 2035 for the two RCP scenarios are negligible.
  • These findings were confirmed in the context of Poland using the World Bank modelling tool based on scenarios used by the IPCC.
  • For both scenarios, the following parameters were analysed: increase in average monthly temperatures, precipitation and number of hot days per year (>35°C)

Source: IPCC AR5 [link], World Bank [link]

[TCFD Risk A]

Risk identification and assessment was performed using the expert method. The process consisted of four steps:

  • identification of risks in individual scenarios
  • risk assessment in individual scenarios (TCFD)
  • analysis and calibration of risk assessments in individual scenarios
  • identification of key climate risks and opportunities

CLIMATE RISK ASSESSMENT

Risk assessment results in the short, medium and long term for two climate scenarios:

THE LIST AND ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE OPPORTUNITIES IDENTIFIED

We identified risks as well as opportunities. The assessment in the short, medium and long term for two climate scenarios is presented in the table below:

List of identified climate risks and opportunities of Allegro:

Principal climate risks:

  • The risk of increased requirements and increased accuracy of non-financial reporting on climate issues
  • The risk of limiting the ability of internal combustion vehicles to make deliveries in urban centres
  • The risk of the need for rapid changes in own and subcontractor fleets (demand greater than the supply of low/zero-emission fleet)
  • The risk of decreased availability of RES for strategic objectives
  • The risk of increased financial burden due to the purchase of electricity
  • The risk of not delivering on climate promises, e.g. insufficient supply of RES energy

Principal climate opportunities:

  • A potential decrease in energy costs through energy efficiency improvements
  • Greater merchant engagement and loyalty to climate issues, and ensuring merchants can meet their obligations (including regulatory requirements) associated with climate change
  • A potential increase in company value due to improvements in ESG.

Risk indicators are listed in the Environmental Impact section, some of which are currently in development.

[TCFD Oversight A]
[TCFD Oversight B]
[TCFD Risk B]

The role of the Board of Directors and management of climate risk is described in the Allegro.eu’s Sustainability Strategy for 2020–2023. The climate risk identification and assessment process is an integral part of the risk management system described in the Risk Management chapter of the report. Allegro also monitors the company’s GHG emissions and environmental impact.

In addition to physical risks, it is also worth mentioning the transformation risks associated with the growing expectations of investors and regulators associated with sustainable development. Due to the nature of our business, we are not able to directly manage and respond to physical risks, both unexpected (resulting from extreme weather events such as droughts, floods or fires) and chronic (resulting from long-term processes such as temperature changes or rising sea levels).

Search results